git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Pete Harlan <pgit@pcharlan.com>
Cc: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>, git list <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] clone: simplify progress message
Date: Sun, 09 May 2010 15:15:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vr5lk90yg.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BE7166A.5030107@pcharlan.com> (Pete Harlan's message of "Sun\, 09 May 2010 13\:09\:14 -0700")

Pete Harlan <pgit@pcharlan.com> writes:

> On 05/09/2010 04:02 AM, Jeff King wrote:
>> On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 06:23:21PM -0700, Pete Harlan wrote:
>> 
>>> "git clone foo bar" currently reports "Cloning into
>>> /path/to/bar/.git".  Change this message to "Cloning into bar" to more
>>> closely match the user's expectation.
>> 
>> I am a little torn on this. For most users, it is just another
>> implementation detail that makes git's output more confusing. And it is
>> likely to be the very first git message seen by many people. But at the
>> same time, it is telling you where the repository actually is, which is
>> something that can help users learn about how git works.
>> 
>> I guess it comes down to how much detail we want to show.
>
> For me it isn't only a matter of detail; I find "Cloning into
> bar/.git" misleading, since bar is getting more than a .git directory.

That is also misleading, as cloning is done into bar/.git and everything
else happens locally as part of the checkout.

I didn't want to go into nitpicky details, but you asked for it ;-)

> Pete Harlan (2):
>   clone: have progress report mention top level dir, not git dir
>   clone: add bare clone to the progress message

I think the squashing these two into one patch makes quite a lot of
sense.  Does any of the existing test need adjustments, by the way?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-05-09 22:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-09  1:23 [PATCH/RFC] clone: have progress report mention top level dir, not git dir Pete Harlan
2010-05-09 11:02 ` Jeff King
2010-05-09 20:09   ` [PATCH v2 0/2] clone: simplify progress message Pete Harlan
2010-05-09 20:10     ` [PATCH v2 1/2] clone: have progress report mention top level dir, not git dir Pete Harlan
2010-05-09 20:11     ` [PATCH v2 2/2] clone: add bare clone to the progress message Pete Harlan
2010-05-09 22:15     ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2010-05-09 23:10       ` [PATCH v2 0/2] clone: simplify " Pete Harlan
2010-05-10  5:47     ` Jeff King
2010-05-10 10:31       ` Michael J Gruber
2010-05-10 14:46         ` [PATCH] clone: report check out for non-bare clones Michael J Gruber
2010-05-12  1:55           ` Junio C Hamano
2010-05-12  7:59             ` Michael J Gruber
2010-05-10 23:22         ` [PATCH v2 0/2] clone: simplify progress message Pete Harlan
2010-05-11  7:27           ` Michael J Gruber

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7vr5lk90yg.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=pgit@pcharlan.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).