From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-remote: make remote name optional for prune operation Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 10:54:04 -0700 Message-ID: <7vr5z2ungj.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1241620621-12188-1-git-send-email-julien@danjou.info> <7vab5qw3nr.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Julien Danjou , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed May 06 19:54:22 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M1lJy-0003KH-5L for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 06 May 2009 19:54:18 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755002AbZEFRyK (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2009 13:54:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754639AbZEFRyH (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2009 13:54:07 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao105.cox.net ([68.230.241.41]:43402 "EHLO fed1rmmtao105.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754390AbZEFRyG (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2009 13:54:06 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao105.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20090506175404.ELMJ20430.fed1rmmtao105.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Wed, 6 May 2009 13:54:04 -0400 Received: from localhost ([68.225.240.211]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id oHu41b00E4aMwMQ04Hu4Ks; Wed, 06 May 2009 13:54:04 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=VMD5vf70d0kA:10 a=94lC-IFnZjQA:10 a=ybZZDoGAAAAA:8 a=WNahTRQW-TSSp6ZTe7sA:9 a=Bp9xsdSL1GyZ7tJuL75X_MlD4vAA:4 a=qIVjreYYsbEA:10 X-CM-Score: 0.00 In-Reply-To: <7vab5qw3nr.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Wed\, 06 May 2009 10\:18\:48 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano writes: > I think we try to make an opearation that discards information from many > things at once by mistake, and it feels that this patch goes against it. Sorry, "by mistake" should have read "harder to trigger by mistake".