From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] fprintf(stderr, "warning: ") -> warning() patches Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 01:01:33 -0700 Message-ID: <7vr60n2vtu.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7v3ad5dxt5.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20090324073513.GA32400@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Miklos Vajna , John Tapsell , Git Mailing List To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Mar 24 09:03:17 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Lm1bQ-0005jA-NX for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:03:17 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753929AbZCXIBr (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 04:01:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753807AbZCXIBq (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 04:01:46 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:63241 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753234AbZCXIBq (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 04:01:46 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE9DA4B93; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 04:01:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BAC3BA4B90; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 04:01:37 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20090324073513.GA32400@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:35:13 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 03B9CC8E-184A-11DE-BE4E-32B0EBB1AA3C-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 02:09:08AM +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote: > >> Okay, here it is, applies on top of master. All, except the http-push >> one, applies cleanly on top of next as well here. > > I manually scanned the patches and they all look sane to me. > Thanks. Thanks; I've done the same and three sets of eyeballs give me a warm fuzzy feeling ;-) Applied.