From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [BUG] assertion failure in builtin-mv.c with "git mv -k" Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:19:40 -0800 Message-ID: <7vr634qkjn.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <496DFC75.2000904@drmicha.warpmail.net> <496E0D1C.20807@drmicha.warpmail.net> <7vbpu91zjf.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <496F15B4.2040104@drmicha.warpmail.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Matthieu Moy , git To: Michael J Gruber X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jan 15 23:21:30 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LNaad-0001qh-L3 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 23:21:28 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935249AbZAOWTx (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:19:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S935243AbZAOWTw (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:19:52 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:45589 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935107AbZAOWTv (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:19:51 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36FCB1C987; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:19:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9080D1C9EF; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:19:41 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <496F15B4.2040104@drmicha.warpmail.net> (Michael J. Gruber's message of "Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:53:40 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 9FFF74C2-E352-11DD-B3FA-2E3B113D384A-77302942!a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Michael J Gruber writes: > I'm happy to follow any variant ("1+2+3", "1 2+3", "1 2 3", in > increasing order of preference) so there's no need to discuss or explain > this further, just tell me "do x" ;) Do nothing ;-) Your 1=3772923 and 2+3=be17262d are already in and we can include the fix in the next 1.6.1.X maintenance release. Thanks.