From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: GIT 1.6.0-rc1 Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:20:08 -0700 Message-ID: <7vr69dky93.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vy73myim5.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080728063838.GB4234@blimp.local> <7vwsj6tsm3.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080728213727.GA3721@blimp.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Alex Riesen X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 29 08:21:18 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KNiaB-0001iG-8t for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:21:15 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755260AbYG2GUQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:20:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755253AbYG2GUP (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:20:15 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:33956 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755244AbYG2GUO (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:20:14 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D8143599; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:20:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-211.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6EFA543598; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:20:10 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20080728213727.GA3721@blimp.local> (Alex Riesen's message of "Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:37:27 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 6718A428-5D36-11DD-97D8-CE28B26B55AE-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Alex Riesen writes: > Junio C Hamano, Mon, Jul 28, 2008 08:44:52 +0200: >> Alex Riesen writes: >> >> > t2103-update-index-ignore-missing.sh still broken on Windows because >> > of stat.st_size being 0 for directories there. >> >> I recall we did not reach a useful conclusion of that discussion. > > Why isn't the proposed patch useful? (and would it be possible to make > the answer out of plain, small and short words?) Can you answer out of plain, small and short words why the proposed patch is correct without unwanted side effects, not just "this seems to solve the particular issue for me but I don't know if it has unintended side effects"?