From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] format-patch: set default stat_width to 72 Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 23:12:23 -0700 Message-ID: <7vr6dmywqg.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20080403102214.GA23121@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jan Engelhardt To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Apr 04 08:13:32 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JhfAw-0004LF-S5 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 04 Apr 2008 08:13:23 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752017AbYDDGMj (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Apr 2008 02:12:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751981AbYDDGMj (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Apr 2008 02:12:39 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:43336 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751930AbYDDGMi (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Apr 2008 02:12:38 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3465E3200; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 02:12:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BBE431FF; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 02:12:33 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20080403102214.GA23121@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Thu, 3 Apr 2008 06:22:14 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: >> format-patch already defaults to "--stat --summary -p" if you give it >> no format options. The default stat is 80, I believe; for format-patch >> it should probably be bumped to 72 anyway. > This should be totally harmless and maint-worthy, I would think. Harmless it might be, in the sense that it won't eat your data. But it loses information, and I am not sure if it is worth it. Why do you even worry about "a few layers of quoting"? Isn't it a much worse offense from responder/commenter's part to quote and NOT trimming diffstat part?