From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: git-svn doesn't like !! in the url Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 15:22:43 -0800 Message-ID: <7vr6gtxlto.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20080107103040.GA28557@soma> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Michael J. Cohen" , Git Mailing List To: Eric Wong X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jan 08 00:23:31 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JC1Ja-0002kk-7y for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 00:23:30 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754205AbYAGXXB (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2008 18:23:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753928AbYAGXXA (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2008 18:23:00 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:38323 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752778AbYAGXXA (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2008 18:23:00 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884ADB284; Mon, 7 Jan 2008 18:22:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15700B281; Mon, 7 Jan 2008 18:22:54 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20080107103040.GA28557@soma> (Eric Wong's message of "Mon, 7 Jan 2008 02:30:40 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Eric Wong writes: > I just dug up cfbe7ab333d68790eb37341e30f040f99cef6af7 and that > should've escaped everything that needs to be urlencoded for HTTP(S). > (you were also the one that noticed the need for that one, too :). > > I also just noticed that changeset didn't make it into 1.5.3.7 nor > maint, however... > > Junio: if there are plans for 1.5.3.8, could you please add > cfbe7ab333d68790eb37341e30f040f99cef6af7 to it? Thanks. Surely I can cherry pick that commit. Are you sure the test in it (t9118) does not depend on any other new features that appear on 'master'?