From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Create a new manpage for the gitignore format, and reference it elsewhere Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 11:24:45 -0700 Message-ID: <7vr6ouqknm.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <46609BC4.9000508@freedesktop.org> <20070601234710.GW3242@planck.djpig.de> <4660BF65.3000605@freedesktop.org> <20070602105648.GX3242@planck.djpig.de> <4661A0BC.2060201@freedesktop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Frank Lichtenheld , git@vger.kernel.org To: Josh Triplett X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jun 02 20:24:52 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HuYHT-0004kw-LA for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 20:24:51 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761865AbXFBSYr (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jun 2007 14:24:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761989AbXFBSYr (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jun 2007 14:24:47 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao104.cox.net ([68.230.241.42]:55374 "EHLO fed1rmmtao104.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761865AbXFBSYq (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jun 2007 14:24:46 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao104.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070602182446.BMD15717.fed1rmmtao104.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 14:24:46 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id 6iQl1X0091kojtg0000000; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 14:24:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4661A0BC.2060201@freedesktop.org> (Josh Triplett's message of "Sat, 02 Jun 2007 09:54:20 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Josh Triplett writes: > Now that I understand the issue you raised, I can easily fix it and > send a revised patch. Expect one momentarily. Thanks both. Yes the original description showed my incompetence in wording.