From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Subproject clones Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 18:26:27 -0700 Message-ID: <7vr6pm7ry4.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20070512011600.GA24354@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: apw@us.ibm.com (Amos Waterland) X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat May 12 03:26:35 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HmgNV-0001Fc-C1 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 12 May 2007 03:26:33 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755678AbXELB03 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 May 2007 21:26:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755083AbXELB03 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 May 2007 21:26:29 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao102.cox.net ([68.230.241.44]:58530 "EHLO fed1rmmtao102.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754789AbXELB02 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 May 2007 21:26:28 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao102.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070512012629.DKMQ2758.fed1rmmtao102.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Fri, 11 May 2007 21:26:29 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id y1ST1W00U1kojtg0000000; Fri, 11 May 2007 21:26:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070512011600.GA24354@us.ibm.com> (Amos Waterland's message of "Fri, 11 May 2007 21:16:00 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: apw@us.ibm.com (Amos Waterland) writes: > Is this intentional? Shouldn't clone get the entire superproject? Yes. As 1.5.2 draft release notes and my response to somebody else last night mentioned, the plumbing level subproject support does _NOT_ recurse into subproject and this is deliberate.