From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Git.pm: config_boolean() -> config_bool() Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 19:12:58 -0700 Message-ID: <7vr6ppo28l.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20070427020601.22991.13792.stgit@rover> <7v7irxko81.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20070509104941.GK4489@pasky.or.cz> <20070509151337.GX4489@pasky.or.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Petr Baudis X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu May 10 04:13:28 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hly9m-0002rq-Mj for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 10 May 2007 04:13:27 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754463AbXEJCND (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2007 22:13:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754519AbXEJCND (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2007 22:13:03 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao103.cox.net ([68.230.241.43]:37009 "EHLO fed1rmmtao103.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754419AbXEJCNA (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2007 22:13:00 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao103.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070510021259.YOSU1318.fed1rmmtao103.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Wed, 9 May 2007 22:12:59 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id xECy1W00T1kojtg0000000; Wed, 09 May 2007 22:12:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070509151337.GX4489@pasky.or.cz> (Petr Baudis's message of "Wed, 9 May 2007 17:13:37 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Petr Baudis writes: > Looks like I forgot to make install or something > when "testing" the patch, also judging by the error messages repo.or.cz > spewed furiously in the last update round. Well, at least I can trust Git.pm and gitweb patches coming thru you better than patches from elsewhere, as I would know if they are broken too badly. People would immediately notice the breakage at repo.or.cz ;-). Thanks.