From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Define a few built-in attribute rules. Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 19:04:00 -0700 Message-ID: <7vr6qm5r73.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <7vr6qod4wh.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <200704131033.15751.andyparkins@gmail.com> <7vejmm78qp.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vvefy5tzo.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Torvalds X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Apr 15 04:04:07 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hcu62-0006hT-V6 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 04:04:07 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752225AbXDOCEE (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Apr 2007 22:04:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753096AbXDOCED (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Apr 2007 22:04:03 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao102.cox.net ([68.230.241.44]:47885 "EHLO fed1rmmtao102.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752225AbXDOCEB (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Apr 2007 22:04:01 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao102.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070415020400.ZAAF1268.fed1rmmtao102.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Sat, 14 Apr 2007 22:04:00 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id nE401W00M1kojtg0000000; Sat, 14 Apr 2007 22:04:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Linus Torvalds's message of "Sat, 14 Apr 2007 18:41:59 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Linus Torvalds writes: > On Sat, 14 Apr 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >> This adds an obviously sane pair of default attribute rules as built-ins. > > I'm not sure. > >> + "[attr]binary !diff !crlf", >> + "* diff crlf", > > Why would > > * diff crlf > > be "obviously sane"? > > In fact, I'd call it obviously insane. > > We do *not* want to default crlf to all files. We want the default to be > "automatic crlf depending on content". You do not have to worry. That's how "crlf" is defined. Paths you explicitly say !crlf will _not_ go through the existing core.autocrlf mechanism. "* crlf" just says, by default everybody is subject to core.autocrlf, and on sane platforms, core.autocrlf is by default off, hence you will not get LF <-> CRLF applied.