From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: RFC: script to add another remote Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:43:26 -0800 Message-ID: <7vr6sh8dsh.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <1172182595.20817.26.camel@dv> <7v8xepde5g.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <1172218468.20390.15.camel@dv> <7vbqjl9td1.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <1172219072.20390.17.camel@dv> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: GIT list To: Pavel Roskin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Feb 23 09:43:32 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HKW1c-00018w-3V for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:43:32 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932140AbXBWIn2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Feb 2007 03:43:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932143AbXBWIn2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Feb 2007 03:43:28 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao106.cox.net ([68.230.241.40]:63001 "EHLO fed1rmmtao106.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932140AbXBWIn2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Feb 2007 03:43:28 -0500 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao106.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070223084329.VCSX2807.fed1rmmtao106.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 03:43:29 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id SwjT1W0011kojtg0000000; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 03:43:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1172219072.20390.17.camel@dv> (Pavel Roskin's message of "Fri, 23 Feb 2007 03:24:32 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Pavel Roskin writes: >> So probably the next step would be to refactor some logic and >> functionality out of git-clone, move them to git-remote, and >> reimplement git-clone in terms of git-remote. Implementation of >> "--more" option would become much simpler (or, almost free) >> after that is done. > > Oh, I see. Thanks for the explanation. Sorry for being incomplete --- obviously you cannot reimplement clone with init and remote alone. You need 'fetch' ;-).