From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] builtin-branch: be prepared for ref-logging Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2007 11:50:05 -0800 Message-ID: <7vr6t73tsi.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <11705213662728-git-send-email-tutufan@gmail.com> <11705277471962-git-send-email-hjemli@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Lars Hjemli X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Feb 03 20:50:12 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HDQtn-0007dB-8A for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2007 20:50:11 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751391AbXBCTuI (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Feb 2007 14:50:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751393AbXBCTuI (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Feb 2007 14:50:08 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtai19.cox.net ([68.230.241.40]:53647 "EHLO fed1rmmtao106.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751391AbXBCTuH (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Feb 2007 14:50:07 -0500 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao106.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070203195006.BBCM1349.fed1rmmtao106.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Sat, 3 Feb 2007 14:50:06 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id K7q51W01c1kojtg0000000; Sat, 03 Feb 2007 14:50:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: <11705277471962-git-send-email-hjemli@gmail.com> (Lars Hjemli's message of "Sat, 3 Feb 2007 19:35:47 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Lars Hjemli writes: > The test for reflog parameter to create_branch() should also have tested > for log_all_ref_updates. But there is no good reason not to prepare a > reflog message, so lets just do it. > > Signed-off-by: Lars Hjemli > --- > > Sorry, the previous patch was obviously no good, since it didn't honour > the case where (reflog==1 && log_all_ref_updates==0) Ah, I did not see your fix-up patch before I sent out my comments. Funny thing is that I thought I fixed this already, but apparently I didn't. It could have been one of my "fixing in working tree, sending out a patch to the list for comments and then forgetting to apply it". Maybe not. In any case, thanks for the fix.