From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Lose perl dependency. (fwd) Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 19:17:49 -0800 Message-ID: <7vr6tp5aqq.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <7vwt3h7dp6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <200701210137.41219.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com> <17842.53449.35322.514320@lisa.zopyra.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Robin Rosenberg , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jan 21 04:18:08 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H8TDW-0002eW-Mr for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 04:18:03 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751154AbXAUDRv (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Jan 2007 22:17:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751170AbXAUDRv (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Jan 2007 22:17:51 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao02.cox.net ([68.230.241.37]:56335 "EHLO fed1rmmtao02.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751154AbXAUDRv (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Jan 2007 22:17:51 -0500 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.03 201-2131-130-104-20060516) with ESMTP id <20070121031750.NPKW9717.fed1rmmtao02.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Sat, 20 Jan 2007 22:17:50 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id DfGu1W00R1kojtg0000000; Sat, 20 Jan 2007 22:16:55 -0500 To: Bill Lear In-Reply-To: <17842.53449.35322.514320@lisa.zopyra.com> (Bill Lear's message of "Sat, 20 Jan 2007 20:32:41 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Bill Lear writes: > How about a '--order' switch? > > --order=chrono[logical] > --order=rev[erse][-chrono[logical]] (default) > > The switches "--reverse" and "--noreverse" are certainly confusing in > the context of a default that is "reverse chronological order". I think --reverse is just fine. It is "reverse" from usual, and people already know (or they should learn) what the usual order is. > BTW, my mailer is defaulting to sending mail to the original poster, > CCing others, including the mailing list. I'm used to simply replying > to the list. Is this the proper convention here, to reply directly to > humans and CC the list? I only speak for myself, but I always prefer to address my message's To: header to the person I am primarily talking to, while leaving other people on Cc: line (which usually includes the list address).