git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
To: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] adding support for md5
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:18:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vr6z9s376.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060821204430.GA2700@tuatara.stupidest.org> (Chris Wedgwood's message of "Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:44:30 -0700")

Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org> writes:

> On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 01:50:32PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>> I can see the point of configurable hashes, but it would be for a
>> stronger hash than sha1, not for a (much) weaker one.
>
> Why any configuration option at all?  What in practice does it really
> buy?

I personally am not interested in making this configurable at
all.  The hashcmp() change on the other hand to abstract out 20
was a good preparation, if we ever want to switch to longer
hashes we would know where to look.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-08-22  6:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-18  6:01 [RFC] adding support for md5 David Rientjes
2006-08-18  9:59 ` Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2006-08-18 10:21 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-08-18 12:31   ` Petr Baudis
2006-08-18 20:35   ` David Rientjes
2006-08-18 10:52 ` Trekie
2006-08-18 10:56   ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-08-18 11:27     ` Trekie
2006-08-18 11:37       ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-08-18 21:52 ` Jon Smirl
2006-08-19  2:35   ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-08-19 20:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-08-21 20:44   ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-08-22  6:18     ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2006-08-23  4:14       ` Shawn Pearce
2006-08-23  4:46         ` Junio C Hamano
2006-08-23  6:49           ` Shawn Pearce
2006-08-24  7:36             ` Junio C Hamano
2006-08-24  8:08               ` Shawn Pearce
2006-08-24 10:34                 ` Junio C Hamano
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-19  3:19 linux
2006-08-19 22:30 ` Petr Baudis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7vr6z9s376.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net \
    --to=junkio@cox.net \
    --cc=cw@f00f.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).