Re: [PATCH] git-ls-files: Fix, document, and add test for --error-unmatch option.

[Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>]

Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> writes:

>  I'm still not sure what the easiest way is for me to provide changes
>  to you. I've been doing it here on the list, like with the current
>  message. But would it be easier for me to send pull requests?

You can decide what is easier for _you_ ;-).

But for me, emailed patches are easier to work on than pull
requests.  I will need to read and understand most of the
changes anyway, unless the change is to an isolated corner of
the system that would affect only one class of users and
breakage will be noticed either immediately or can be left
broken if nobody uses that (e.g. things like contrib/ and some
foreign SCM interfaces).  I would like others on the list to be
able to review the same changes that might hit my tree and
provide extra sets of eyeballs to spot things I might miss
myself alone.

>  For example, with the git-clone failure cleanup I recently did, it
>  seems the new test case I wrote didn't land in your tree.

Sorry, I think I just forgot to apply that one.  I still have
the message so no need to resend.  Thanks for reminding.