* [REQ] git-announce mailing list
@ 2005-09-14 8:42 Cal Peake
2005-09-21 14:32 ` Petr Baudis
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Cal Peake @ 2005-09-14 8:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Git Mailing List; +Cc: postmaster
Any chance for a git-announce list on vger?
thanks,
-cp
--
". . . tell 'em we use Linux." -- Dave Chappelle
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [REQ] git-announce mailing list
2005-09-14 8:42 [REQ] git-announce mailing list Cal Peake
@ 2005-09-21 14:32 ` Petr Baudis
2005-09-21 20:14 ` Junio C Hamano
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Petr Baudis @ 2005-09-21 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cal Peake; +Cc: Git Mailing List, postmaster
Dear diary, on Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:42:50AM CEST, I got a letter
where Cal Peake <cp@absolutedigital.net> told me that...
> Any chance for a git-announce list on vger?
Did my fellow git-related maintainers not reply because they were
waiting to hpa to reply, and hpa not reply since he didn't see any
interest by the maintainers? Or something else happenned to this idea?
Would any other people find this useful?
--
Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
VI has two modes: the one in which it beeps and the one in which
it doesn't.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [REQ] git-announce mailing list
2005-09-21 14:32 ` Petr Baudis
@ 2005-09-21 20:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-09-21 21:40 ` Johannes Schindelin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2005-09-21 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Petr Baudis; +Cc: git
Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> writes:
> Did my fellow git-related maintainers not reply because they were
> waiting to hpa to reply, and hpa not reply since he didn't see any
> interest by the maintainers?
I did not because I felt anything other than the following three
would be just adding noise to already high traffic:
(1) "I am the vger.kernel.org list maintainer and I will create
one".
(2) "I do not have enough time to keep up with git list but I
want to get only announce -- count me in please".
(3) "It is not a good idea because...".
and whatever I would have said would not have been any of the
above.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [REQ] git-announce mailing list
2005-09-21 20:14 ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2005-09-21 21:40 ` Johannes Schindelin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Schindelin @ 2005-09-21 21:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: Petr Baudis, git
Hi,
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> (3) "It is not a good idea because...".
... because at the current stage, changes happen very quickly, and very
often. Most of the times, you really can only understand what the change
is about if you
1) happen to know how git was supposed to work before the change,
and
2) happen to understand what is being discussed anyway.
I'll feel differently after 1.0 is released, mostly since I know that
Junio will release it only after git grew up to be stable enough to evolve
at a much slower pace. I expect mostly merge enhancements and porcelain
improvements after that.
Ciao,
Dscho
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-09-21 21:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-09-14 8:42 [REQ] git-announce mailing list Cal Peake
2005-09-21 14:32 ` Petr Baudis
2005-09-21 20:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-09-21 21:40 ` Johannes Schindelin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).