From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: jpinheiro <7jpinheiro@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] t3600: test rm of path with changed leading symlinks
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 21:59:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vsj35efne.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130405000009.GA27775@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Thu, 4 Apr 2013 20:00:09 -0400")
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> Here's a replacement for patch 3, then. I wasn't sure if the
> editorializing in the last 2 paragraphs should go in the commit message
> or the cover letter; feel free to tweak as you see fit.
They look fine as they are.
> That means the worst case is not the accidental loss of content,
> but rather confusion by the user when a copy of a file another
> part of the tree is removed.
A copy of a file that is on the filesystem that may not be related
to the project at all may be lost, and the user may not notice the
lossage for quite a while. A symlink that points at /etc/passwd may
cause the file to be removed and the user will hopefully notice, but
if the pointed-at file is something in $HOME/tmp/ that you occasionally
use, you may not notice the lossage immediately, and when you notice
the loss, the only assurance you have is that there is a blob that
records what was lost _somewhere_ in _some_ of your project that had
a symlink that points at $HOME/tmp/ at some point in the past.
"Exists somewhere, not lost" is not a very useful assurance, if you
ask me ;-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-05 5:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-03 14:50 Behavior of git rm jpinheiro
2013-04-03 15:58 ` Jeff King
2013-04-03 17:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-03 20:36 ` Jeff King
2013-04-04 19:02 ` Jeff King
2013-04-04 19:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] rm: do not complain about d/f conflicts during deletion Jeff King
2013-04-04 19:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] t3600: test behavior of reverse-d/f conflict Jeff King
2013-04-04 19:06 ` [PATCH 3/3] t3600: test rm of path with changed leading symlinks Jeff King
2013-04-04 19:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-04 19:55 ` Jeff King
2013-04-04 20:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-04 21:03 ` Jeff King
2013-04-04 23:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-04 23:29 ` Jeff King
2013-04-04 23:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-05 0:00 ` Jeff King
2013-04-05 4:59 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2013-04-05 5:04 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vsj35efne.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=7jpinheiro@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).