From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Proposal: branch..remotepush Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 09:11:28 -0800 Message-ID: <7vsj563f3z.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <5113E849.8000602@elegosoft.com> <20130207233017.GD19397@google.com> <7v38x766b2.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20130208074813.GA7337@elie.Belkin> <7v622343uy.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <5114D5B0.5080906@drmicha.warpmail.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jonathan Nieder , Ramkumar Ramachandra , Michael Schubert , Git List , Jeff King To: Michael J Gruber X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Feb 08 18:11:58 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U3rUR-0002R3-B5 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 18:11:55 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1946746Ab3BHRLb (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2013 12:11:31 -0500 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:51160 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1946671Ab3BHRLa (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2013 12:11:30 -0500 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271DDB1DC; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 12:11:30 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=/+jG4xj6155UK+iYqbJp3PTCU5U=; b=ZzSYaU IXdU4vRZWg1hn5St9vbRZrmn+6BpdGg6Z7bKpGgCij+1/gibJ7NGcRlTIsZ1Y9op hfgpEwcHFMSGMtWJZVt6n3ori30607yMU+clfe5PBTkP+d66h3El51rudyE5pjOt ctYhHyWNEbpb3UKpvNqF6Va3LDhXXmD9RohT0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=EUigYVbM8glIMUAEsgiSGkkviQM1wplu 5NjNDDjkz4r6mK+Iar4fg9AoHe3MMO00zDbiP0RKlymPohu8tNkN6xOCPpvousBu 8CjfpwlULfht6jDN4lsvmIsHK6kXg4tWUHJ6HAoMPfHkDOjn7SKZhYpA9qoy/JH0 qYWaqzNuxrA= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A9BFB1D9; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 12:11:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [98.234.214.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 88A0DB1D8; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 12:11:29 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <5114D5B0.5080906@drmicha.warpmail.net> (Michael J. Gruber's message of "Fri, 08 Feb 2013 11:38:40 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 942FECB4-7212-11E2-8C45-BCD12E706CDE-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Michael J Gruber writes: > As for the triangle remote, I really think we should clean up the > situation regarding push, pushurlinsteadof and the various different and > inconclusive output formats of "git remote" (with or without "-v", with > or without a remote name) first, before introducing yet another way to > twist things around. "git push downstream" does not hurt any kittens > (while git remote ouput does, somehwat). As people tend to fetch more often than they push if they are working on a real project where the others as a whole will be far more productive than any single individual, I agree that keeping "git fetch" (or "git pull") lazy by having "origin" point at where they fetch from and be a bit more explicit in "git push" would actually make sense.