From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [RFC] Should "log --cc" imply "log --cc -p"? Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 07:46:52 -0800 Message-ID: <7vsj5avk43.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vmwvl6lj9.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <510F95D7.6010107@drmicha.warpmail.net> <7vfw1c3ujo.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20130205093307.GC24973@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Michael J Gruber , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 05 16:47:25 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U2kjw-0008Gc-Ng for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:47:21 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755150Ab3BEPq4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2013 10:46:56 -0500 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:57424 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751858Ab3BEPq4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2013 10:46:56 -0500 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1BD5BE82; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 10:46:55 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=l116gTg49K+lERZl+3Bb5VyM1Ks=; b=aLDl74 rrBk6xticzhCGZZvK/aVtFDn90Ehh5OAzbrf5ODHpZkCzegtyR5hHapSc6E+JwAQ K164wvXE73aH0G2Js+Nh9tXvpfxwkdB9N6+U5EbXqUL4VE2UW9ZWZYzr5cTxhx7I 78NVPlzCz55fFMuffjfrane+dYWfd7Sa3/8bc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=kmix1ia+VWhK6RtBSXgIJUJRvdN4Duwy wYN8IoU8692TpDfMwMMHeXGiLONYOsgC5ktRvohpYB/B5FFIbyQx7ByE86hAj7Pq Z5p6x7RpjxZCU/TqEJHQjLhYGpCn8YfWK5DrAu6Qq6emKfLenZGIjS45gILko7Gz /3uhmEUxGF4= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 950A0BE81; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 10:46:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [98.234.214.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 02DA4BE7D; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 10:46:53 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20130205093307.GC24973@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Tue, 5 Feb 2013 04:33:07 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 43AF80F6-6FAB-11E2-93E0-F0CE2E706CDE-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > git log --cc --stat > > the "--cc" is significant. So I don't think it is right for "--cc" to > always imply "-p". But if the rule kicked in only when no other format > had been specified, that might make sense. Yes, it was my mistake that I left it unsaid. Obviously the description of the "minor irritation" must be qualified with "unless no other output options like --raw, --stat, etc. are given". Thanks.