git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] credentials: add "store" helper
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:19:06 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vsjl6ssf9.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20111124110756.GJ8417@sigill.intra.peff.net

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> +static void parse_credential_file(const char *fn,
> +				  struct credential *c,
> +				  void (*match_cb)(struct credential *),
> +				  void (*other_cb)(struct strbuf *))
> +{
> +	FILE *fh;
> +	struct strbuf line = STRBUF_INIT;
> +	struct credential entry = CREDENTIAL_INIT;
> +
> +	fh = fopen(fn, "r");
> +	if (!fh) {
> +		if (errno != ENOENT)
> +			die_errno("unable to open %s", fn);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	while (strbuf_getline(&line, fh, '\n') != EOF) {
> +		credential_from_url(&entry, line.buf);
> +		if (entry.username && entry.password &&
> +		    credential_match(c, &entry)) {

This looks curious; isn't checking .username and .password part of the
responsibility of credential_match()? And even if entry lacks password
(which won't happen in the context of this program, given the
implementation of store_credential() below) shouldn't it still be
considered a match?

> +			if (match_cb) {
> +				match_cb(&entry);
> +				break;

Multiple matches not allowed, which sounds fine.

> +			}
> +		}
> +		else if (other_cb)
> +			other_cb(&line);
> +	}
> +
> +	credential_clear(&entry);
> +	strbuf_release(&line);
> +	fclose(fh);
> +}
> +
> +static void print_entry(struct credential *c)
> +{
> +	printf("username=%s\n", c->username);
> +	printf("password=%s\n", c->password);
> +}
> +
> +static void print_line(struct strbuf *buf)
> +{
> +	strbuf_addch(buf, '\n');
> +	write_or_die(credential_lock.fd, buf->buf, buf->len);
> +}
> +
> +static void rewrite_credential_file(const char *fn, struct credential *c,
> +				    struct strbuf *extra)
> +{
> +	umask(077);

Curious placement of umask(). I would expect a function that has its own
call to umask() restore it before it returns, and a stand-alone program
whose sole purpose is to work with a private file, setting a tight umask
upfront at the beginning of main() may be easier to understand.

> +	if (hold_lock_file_for_update(&credential_lock, fn, 0) < 0)
> +		die_errno("unable to get credential storage lock");
> +	parse_credential_file(fn, c, NULL, print_line);
> +	if (extra)
> +		print_line(extra);

An entry for a newly updated password comes at the end of the file,
instead of replacing an entry already in the file in-place? Given that
parse_credential_file() when processing a look-up request (which is the
majority of the case) stops upon finding a match, it might make more sense
to have the new one (which may be expected to be used often) at the
beginning instead, no?

> +	if (commit_lock_file(&credential_lock) < 0)
> +		die_errno("unable to commit credential store");
> +}
> +
> +static void store_credential(const char *fn, struct credential *c)
> +{
> +	struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
> +
> +	if (!c->protocol || !(c->host || c->path) ||
> +	    !c->username || !c->password)
> +		return;
> +
> +	strbuf_addf(&buf, "%s://", c->protocol);
> +	strbuf_addstr_urlencode(&buf, c->username, 1);
> +	strbuf_addch(&buf, ':');
> +	strbuf_addstr_urlencode(&buf, c->password, 1);
> +	strbuf_addch(&buf, '@');
> +	if (c->host)
> +		strbuf_addstr_urlencode(&buf, c->host, 1);
> +	if (c->path) {
> +		strbuf_addch(&buf, '/');
> +		strbuf_addstr_urlencode(&buf, c->path, 0);
> +	}
> +
> +	rewrite_credential_file(fn, c, &buf);
> +	strbuf_release(&buf);
> +}
> +
> +static void remove_credential(const char *fn, struct credential *c)
> +{
> +	if (!c->protocol || !(c->host || c->path))
> +		return;

The choice of the fields looks rather arbitrary. I cannot say "remove all
the credentials whose username is 'gitster' at 'github.com' no matter what
protocol is used", but I can say "remove all credentials under any name
for any host as long as the transfer goes over 'https' and accesses a
repository at 'if/xyzzy' path", it seems.

This filtering matches what lookup_credential() does but shouldn't it be
implemented at a single place in any case?

> +	rewrite_credential_file(fn, c, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +static int lookup_credential(const char *fn, struct credential *c)
> +{
> +	if (!c->protocol || !(c->host || c->path))
> +		return 0;
> +	parse_credential_file(fn, c, print_entry, NULL);
> +	return c->username && c->password;
> +}

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-11-29 18:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-24 10:58 [PATCH 0/13] credential helpers, take two Jeff King
2011-11-24 10:58 ` [PATCH 01/13] test-lib: add test_config_global variant Jeff King
2011-11-24 10:59 ` [PATCH 02/13] t5550: fix typo Jeff King
2011-11-24 11:01 ` [PATCH 03/13] introduce credentials API Jeff King
2011-11-28 21:46   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-11-29  5:04     ` Jeff King
2011-11-29 17:34       ` Junio C Hamano
2011-11-29 21:14         ` Jeff King
2011-11-24 11:01 ` [PATCH 04/13] credential: add function for parsing url components Jeff King
2011-11-24 11:01 ` [PATCH 05/13] http: use credential API to get passwords Jeff King
2011-11-24 11:02 ` [PATCH 06/13] credential: apply helper config Jeff King
2011-11-24 11:02 ` [PATCH 07/13] credential: add credential.*.username Jeff King
2011-11-24 11:03 ` [PATCH 08/13] credential: make relevance of http path configurable Jeff King
2011-11-24 11:05 ` [PATCH 09/13] docs: end-user documentation for the credential subsystem Jeff King
2011-11-24 11:07 ` [PATCH 10/13] credentials: add "cache" helper Jeff King
2011-11-24 14:36   ` Eric Sunshine
2011-11-29  0:42   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-11-29  5:04     ` Jeff King
2011-11-24 11:07 ` [PATCH 11/13] strbuf: add strbuf_add*_urlencode Jeff King
2011-11-29 18:19   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-11-29 21:19     ` Jeff King
2011-11-29 23:26       ` René Scharfe
2011-11-30  3:20         ` Jeff King
2011-11-30  5:40           ` Junio C Hamano
2011-11-30  5:41           ` René Scharfe
2011-11-24 11:07 ` [PATCH 12/13] credentials: add "store" helper Jeff King
2011-11-24 14:29   ` Eric Sunshine
2011-11-24 20:09     ` Jeff King
2011-11-29 18:19   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2011-11-29 21:38     ` Jeff King
2011-11-24 11:09 ` [PATCH 13/13] t: add test harness for external credential helpers Jeff King
2011-11-24 11:45 ` [PATCH 0/13] credential helpers, take two Erik Faye-Lund
2011-11-24 11:53   ` Jeff King
2011-11-24 12:08     ` Erik Faye-Lund
2011-11-27  8:27 ` [PATCH 0/6] echo usernames as they are typed Jeff King
2011-11-27  8:28   ` [PATCH 1/6] move git_getpass to its own source file Jeff King
2011-11-27  8:29   ` [PATCH 2/6] refactor git_getpass into generic prompt function Jeff King
2011-11-27  8:30   ` [PATCH 3/6] stub out getpass_echo function Jeff King
2011-11-27  8:30   ` [PATCH 4/6] prompt: add PROMPT_ECHO flag Jeff King
2011-11-27  8:31   ` [PATCH 5/6] credential: use git_prompt instead of git_getpass Jeff King
2011-11-27  8:31   ` [PATCH 6/6] compat/getpass: add a /dev/tty implementation Jeff King
2011-11-27  8:56   ` [PATCH 0/6] echo usernames as they are typed Junio C Hamano
2011-11-27  9:17   ` Erik Faye-Lund
2011-11-28  3:53     ` Jeff King
2011-11-28  9:36       ` Erik Faye-Lund
2011-11-28 11:31         ` Jeff King
2011-11-28 11:49           ` Frans Klaver
2011-11-28 12:59           ` Erik Faye-Lund
2011-11-28 18:59             ` Jeff King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7vsjl6ssf9.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).