* [PATCH] diff A...B: do not limit the syntax too narrowly
@ 2010-07-16 19:14 Junio C Hamano
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2010-07-16 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
Earlier we tried to make sure that the trees we get are what A...B
syntax produced, by checking that earlier ones are all marked
uninteresting (which has to be true as they are merge bases),
there are two remaining ones that are interesting, and they are
marked as non-symmetric-left and symmetric-left respectively.
The "the last two must be interesting" condition is however wrong when one
is an ancestor of the other between A and B (i.e. fast-forward). In such
a case, one of them is marked uninteresting.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
---
* This breakage should have been obvious (e.g. "git diff master...next"
should exhibit it). Sorry about it.
Also "the second from the last one should not be SYMMETRIC_LEFT"
condition does not hold if somebody does "git diff HEAD...HEAD", but
that is a bit of borderline insanity.
We *could* tighten the rule to say "the last two must be interesting or
listed as one of the merge bases" to tighten the rule again, but I
don't think it is worth it.
builtin-diff.c | 13 -------------
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin-diff.c b/builtin-diff.c
index 62b483b..192cbb2 100644
--- a/builtin-diff.c
+++ b/builtin-diff.c
@@ -407,19 +407,6 @@ int cmd_diff(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
result = builtin_diff_tree(&rev, argc, argv, ent);
else if (ent[0].item->flags & UNINTERESTING) {
/*
- * Perhaps the user gave us A...B, which expands
- * to a list of negative merge bases followed by
- * A (symmetric-left) and B? Let's make sure...
- */
- for (i = 1; i < ents; i++)
- if (!(ent[i].item->flags & UNINTERESTING))
- break;
- if (ents != i + 2 ||
- (ent[i+1].item->flags & UNINTERESTING) ||
- (!(ent[i].item->flags & SYMMETRIC_LEFT)) ||
- (ent[i+1].item->flags & SYMMETRIC_LEFT))
- die("what do you mean by that?");
- /*
* diff A...B where there is at least one merge base
* between A and B. We have ent[0] == merge-base,
* ent[ents-2] == A, and ent[ents-1] == B. Show diff
--
1.7.2.rc3.255.g7a7d8
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2010-07-16 19:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-07-16 19:14 [PATCH] diff A...B: do not limit the syntax too narrowly Junio C Hamano
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).