From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>,
"Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>,
git@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] upload-pack: squelch progress indicator if client does not request sideband
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:57:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vski0c8gi.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200906162041.16608.j6t@kdbg.org> (Johannes Sixt's message of "Tue\, 16 Jun 2009 20\:41\:16 +0200")
Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> writes:
> On Dienstag, 16. Juni 2009, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> ...
>> I don't think it is worth it at all. The regression is purely cosmetic,
>> and I suspect you'll have a really hard time finding someone still using
>> those ancient git clients anyway. Remember that such clients are unable
>> to fetch with HTTP from repositories using version 2 of the pack index
>> by default already. That's why we created version 1.4.4.5.
>
> Keep in mind that there could exist clients outside git.git that use modern
> pack-index or unpack-objects, but omit sideband support.
>
> I propose this patch instead, although the assumption that the --timeout
> option is only used by git-daemon may not be quite right. In this case it
> may be better to add a new option that sets the new flag and that
> git-daemon has to use.
Even though I tend to agree with Nico, this patch strikes a good balance
with a very small impact. I am beginning to like it.
There _could_ be people who run fetch over git/ssh with custom --exec
option that has --timeout in it. We _could_ teach --run-by-daemon option
to the (daemon, upload-pack) pair in the same release (because it is
reasonable to assume they come from the same vintage of git) to fix that
case. But I do not think it is worth it. As Nico says, this is purely
cosmetic.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-16 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-14 20:38 [PATCH] daemon: send stderr of service programs to the syslog Johannes Sixt
2009-06-15 14:57 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-06-15 15:34 ` Nicolas Pitre
2009-06-15 19:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-06-15 21:24 ` [PATCH] upload-pack: squelch progress indicator if client does not request sideband Johannes Sixt
2009-06-15 21:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-06-16 1:16 ` Nicolas Pitre
2009-06-16 5:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-06-16 18:03 ` Nicolas Pitre
2009-06-16 18:41 ` Johannes Sixt
2009-06-16 18:57 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2009-06-16 19:46 ` Nicolas Pitre
2009-06-15 21:39 ` [PATCH] daemon: send stderr of service programs to the syslog Johannes Sixt
2009-06-15 21:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-06-16 20:27 ` Johannes Sixt
2009-06-16 20:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-06-19 20:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-06-20 19:25 ` Johannes Sixt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vski0c8gi.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
--cc=nico@cam.org \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).