From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce core.keepHardLinks Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 07:01:43 -0700 Message-ID: <7vskr0bnlk.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20081012183855.GA5255@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Shawn O. Pearce" , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Oct 13 16:03:10 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KpO0o-0004m0-CP for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:03:06 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752869AbYJMOBy (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:01:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752780AbYJMOBy (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:01:54 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:33420 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751306AbYJMOBy (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:01:54 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E1E86E9BE; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:01:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-211.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD9C36E9BD; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:01:46 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:58:01 +0200 (CEST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 7C6E7520-992F-11DD-B4DF-1E1F86D30F62-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: >> I cannot fathom why a user wants this much rope to hang themselves >> with... > > The question is not so much why anyone want to do this, but _if_. Sorry, I think the question should be _why_. You can gain a sympathetic "Ah, that is sensible, and 'this much rope to hang themselves with' comment was unwarranted" only by answering that question.