From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful? Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 00:53:26 -0700 Message-ID: <7vskvv2bux.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <200806030314.03252.jnareb@gmail.com> <200806030932.03051.jnareb@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Linus Torvalds , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jakub Narebski X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jun 03 09:55:51 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K3RMV-0006uD-Hp for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2008 09:55:19 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751263AbYFCHyO (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jun 2008 03:54:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752792AbYFCHxv (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jun 2008 03:53:51 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:45512 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751793AbYFCHxl (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jun 2008 03:53:41 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B124938AA; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 03:53:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E182138A9; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 03:53:34 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <200806030932.03051.jnareb@gmail.com> (Jakub Narebski's message of "Tue, 3 Jun 2008 09:32:02 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 2E673498-3142-11DD-A706-F9737025C2AA-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jakub Narebski writes: > [*1*] I assume that this kind of merge is called 'octopus' because it > has more than two "legs" (parents), and not for example because > first such merge had 8 parents? The first one ever was actually a pentapus, 211232b (Octopus merge of the following five patches., 2005-05-05). "gitk 211232b" was a beautiful sight back then, and it still is. The history was much simpler back then.