From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] completion: remove use of dashed git commands Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 10:51:24 -0700 Message-ID: <7vskxgbejn.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1208712525-1747-1-git-send-email-dpmcgee@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Dan McGee , spearce@spearce.org, git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Apr 20 19:52:33 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JndiH-0000sl-1l for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 19:52:29 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754958AbYDTRvn (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Apr 2008 13:51:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754943AbYDTRvn (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Apr 2008 13:51:43 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:35164 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754909AbYDTRvm (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Apr 2008 13:51:42 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEF29674B; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 13:51:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 072D46746; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 13:51:32 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:43:37 +0100 (BST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > Hi, > > On Sun, 20 Apr 2008, Dan McGee wrote: > >> [no commit message] > > I would like to deprecate dashed form _officially_ first (as in > ReleaseNotes), before doing something that could lead to quite some > surprised users. I'd share your distaste against an empty log message to justify the changes, but I do not see where those "quite some surprised users" would come from. At least people know "git foo" form is and has been supported, so if somebody changes "git-ls-files" to "git ls-files", nobody would go "gee, I did not know I can write it without dash" these days...