From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Minor annoyance with git push Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:19:41 -0800 Message-ID: <7vskzn5w3m.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7v7ihd7ee1.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080210101756.GB26568@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20080210122321.GA31009@coredump.intra.peff.net> <7vzltwavf9.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080220140306.GA6928@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7vk5kz7btw.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080220181513.GA16289@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Steffen Prohaska , Martin Langhoff , Git Mailing List To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Feb 20 19:20:54 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JRtYo-0001Ap-Cz for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:20:50 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757838AbYBTSUF (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:20:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755102AbYBTSUF (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:20:05 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:43680 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755080AbYBTSUD (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:20:03 -0500 Received: from .pobox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55573334F; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:20:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FDCE3346; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:19:49 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20080220181513.GA16289@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:15:14 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > Meaning you will take this patch? (And yes, I think the "+HEAD" patch > you sent is a good fix, regardless of everything else we've talked > about). Yes I would, except that I think Daniel's is much better and is to the point. Doesn't it cover all the issues we discussed so far? > ... Once the behavior is configurable at all, we > can see how people adopt it into their workflows and if there is really > any desire for detection at all. Yup.