From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [msysGit] Re: safecrlf not in 1.5.4 Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:41:29 -0800 Message-ID: <7vsl10jity.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1200022189-2400-1-git-send-email-mlevedahl@gmail.com> <1200022189-2400-2-git-send-email-mlevedahl@gmail.com> <7v1w8o4ws0.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <30e4a070801111252s4e17b9c4m62adeb9032963e66@mail.gmail.com> <7v63xzzszp.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <478855B5.9070600@gmail.com> <7vbq7ry405.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <47885B2C.8020809@gmail.com> <7v7iify2wm.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <4788BFA8.2030508@gmail.com> <7vwsqeubj8.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <47891658.3090604@gmail.com> <7vbq7qssd7.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <47893E1A.5020702@gmail.com> <7v4pdislrf.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vir1xmazm.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <31687420-EB17-4651-AD6C-07213311ABDA@zib.de> <7vejcklv84.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Mark Levedahl , Git Mailing List , msysGit To: Steffen Prohaska X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jan 14 20:42:12 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JEVCF-00070y-1E for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:42:11 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753872AbYANTlo (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:41:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753506AbYANTlo (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:41:44 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:40952 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753197AbYANTln (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:41:43 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7B982A19; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:41:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 117142A18; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:41:35 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Steffen Prohaska's message of "Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:29:04 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Steffen Prohaska writes: > On Jan 14, 2008, at 8:30 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> By definition of 'maint', 1.5.4.X are to fix bugs in the >> features that are in 1.5.4, so the answer is no. > > I expected this answer. And it won't change. >> But we could end up having a short cycle for 1.5.5 if we agree >> that the lack of crlf=safe is a severe bug that is worth fixing >> post 1.5.4. > ... > So I should try harder to find better arguments. But this has > time until the 1.5.4 release is out. For now, I am being quiet. Instead, you could be louder and convince people that it is a severe bug worth fixing before 1.5.4, like Linus did with the issue with performance regression on a partial commit. It's entirely your choice. > (Well, I'll continue to improve the safecrlf patch and most > likely will send it to the list, too...) Please do. "I am currently not convinced" does not mean "I am always right" nor "I won't reconsider".