From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Linking with -R (rpath) not supported on Darwin Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 14:41:51 -0700 Message-ID: <7vsl4rdgf4.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <4D954ADB-E66E-43CA-87EE-7522FFA87370@lrde.epita.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git list To: Benoit SIGOURE X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Oct 03 23:42:21 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IdBym-0005x0-Q9 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 03 Oct 2007 23:42:05 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755097AbXJCVl5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Oct 2007 17:41:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754597AbXJCVl5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Oct 2007 17:41:57 -0400 Received: from rune.pobox.com ([208.210.124.79]:54888 "EHLO rune.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754550AbXJCVl4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Oct 2007 17:41:56 -0400 Received: from rune (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rune.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B15D14123E; Wed, 3 Oct 2007 17:42:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A31A814122D; Wed, 3 Oct 2007 17:42:14 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <4D954ADB-E66E-43CA-87EE-7522FFA87370@lrde.epita.fr> (Benoit SIGOURE's message of "Wed, 3 Oct 2007 23:34:41 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Benoit SIGOURE writes: > It didn't harm but the build process should be more careful to not use > options that are not supported by the compiler. And it's not a > matter of using -Wl,-rpath instead. As I do not have an access to a Darwin box (nor anybody sent me a free Mac yet), I do not have any interest in fixing it myself nor more importantly any means to verify the result. That makes it _your_ build process that should be more careful ;-). You know where -R is coming from and can find out what options _your_ platform wants, so why not send in a patch _before_ complaining?