From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: git-apply versus git-am Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 01:54:51 -0700 Message-ID: <7vsl7flctg.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: "Sean Kelley" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jul 23 10:55:33 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ICthV-0000GT-3D for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:55:33 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760921AbXGWIyz (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jul 2007 04:54:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1765968AbXGWIyy (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jul 2007 04:54:54 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao104.cox.net ([68.230.241.42]:45722 "EHLO fed1rmmtao104.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1765837AbXGWIyx (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jul 2007 04:54:53 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao104.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20070723085452.VMYD1393.fed1rmmtao104.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 04:54:52 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id Swur1X0091kojtg0000000; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 04:54:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Sean Kelley's message of "Mon, 23 Jul 2007 02:54:31 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Sean Kelley" writes: > Why doesn't git-apply include an option for a signoff line like git-am? > > git-applymbox /tmp/mbox ~/.signoff > > Or am I missing something? (most likely the case!) applymbox is going away.