From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Example Cogito Addon - cogito-bundle Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:48:40 -0700 Message-ID: <7vslhlxmt3.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20061018053647.GA3507@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20061018185225.GU20017@pasky.or.cz> <20061018185907.GV20017@pasky.or.cz> <7vy7rd1m4q.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20061018191834.GA18829@spearce.org> <20061018204626.GA19194@spearce.org> <20061018214143.GF19194@spearce.org> <7vwt6xxofi.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Oct 19 00:48:52 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GaKDN-0005ob-7H for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:48:45 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423119AbWJRWsm (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:48:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1423121AbWJRWsm (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:48:42 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao07.cox.net ([68.230.241.32]:61167 "EHLO fed1rmmtao07.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423119AbWJRWsl (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:48:41 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao07.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20061018224841.KDZG28934.fed1rmmtao07.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:48:41 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id byok1V00R1kojtg0000000 Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:48:44 -0400 To: Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: (Linus Torvalds's message of "Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:42:50 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Linus Torvalds writes: > On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >> It should not be hard to write another program that generates a >> packfile like pack-object does but taking a thin pack as its >> input. Then receive-pack can drive it instead of >> unpack-objects. > > Give me half an hour. It should be trivial to make "unpack-objects" write > the "unpacked" objects into a pack-file instead. Heh, three people having the same idea that goes in the same direction at the same time is not necessarily a good sign of efficient project management... I am currently fighting with FC5 so please go ahead.