From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add --dry-run option to git-send-email Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 10:44:59 -0700 Message-ID: <7vslhw12w4.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20061010145823.GB8993@parisc-linux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Oct 10 19:45:19 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXLfA-0003pG-BA for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 19:45:08 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751057AbWJJRpE (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:45:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751081AbWJJRpD (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:45:03 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao12.cox.net ([68.230.241.27]:3470 "EHLO fed1rmmtao12.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751074AbWJJRpA (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:45:00 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao12.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20061010174500.UHDX26416.fed1rmmtao12.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:45:00 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id Yhl21V00n1kojtg0000000 Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:45:03 -0400 To: Matthew Wilcox User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Matthew Wilcox writes: > Add a --dry-run option to git-send-email due to having made too many > mistakes with it in the past week. I like having a safety catch on my > machine gun. > > Signed-off-by: Matthew @ilcox Good. When I have to look into other people's issues with send-email, I used to say "--smtp-server=/var/tmp/send" which is this script: #!/bin/sh for i do echo "arg $i" done sed -e 's/^/Msg: /' I hope your patch makes the above hack unneeded (I want to see what is fed to sendmail, what goes on the header and body).