From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-rev-list(1): group options; reformat; document more options Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:06:54 -0700 Message-ID: <7vsljc78m9.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20060831223715.GC482@diku.dk> <20060831230811.GE482@diku.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jonas Fonseca , Git Mailing List , Timo Hirvonen X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Sep 01 02:06:01 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GIwXg-00051l-Tt for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2006 02:05:53 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932496AbWIAAFt (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Aug 2006 20:05:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932498AbWIAAFt (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Aug 2006 20:05:49 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao04.cox.net ([68.230.241.35]:50116 "EHLO fed1rmmtao04.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932496AbWIAAFs (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Aug 2006 20:05:48 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao04.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060901000547.GGDC6711.fed1rmmtao04.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 20:05:47 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id Go5n1V00c1kojtg0000000 Thu, 31 Aug 2006 20:05:48 -0400 To: Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: (Linus Torvalds's message of "Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:15:39 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Linus Torvalds writes: > On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Jonas Fonseca wrote: >> Linus Torvalds wrote Thu, Aug 31, 2006: >> > >> > Umm? You should get a "usage" error, no? >> >> Yes, ok, they do not seem to make sense for git-rev-list, however if you >> pass either to git-log, the output seems to make room for a diff, adding >> one extra newline, but without appending any diff. > > Ahh. I think that a "-r" without any other request for patches (or > "--name-status" or similar) should probably imply "--raw". At least that > was how it historically worked.. > > Anyway, _if_ it ever worked (and I think it did, but I'm way too lazy to > bother checking), this may have been broken by the extensive diff option > cleanups by Timo in June. Timo? Junio? I think it did too. I am kind of surprised that nobody noticed and t4013 test (which was done specifically to catch potential behaviour change by Timo's patch) did not check for this particular case.