From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] git-cvsexportcommit.perl: Fix usage() output. Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:04:52 -0800 Message-ID: <7vsltyvnjf.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20051114164047.GB9131@raven.localdomain> <20051114164505.GF9131@raven.localdomain> <7vbr0mx4fj.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <46a038f90511141420u11e396d3q9a6710c79abe0ca3@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Kevin Geiss , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Nov 15 00:06:54 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EbnNt-0001p7-1A for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 00:05:09 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932187AbVKNXEz (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Nov 2005 18:04:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932186AbVKNXEz (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Nov 2005 18:04:55 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao06.cox.net ([68.230.241.33]:51445 "EHLO fed1rmmtao06.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932187AbVKNXEy (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Nov 2005 18:04:54 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao06.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20051114230342.XTFV20050.fed1rmmtao06.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 18:03:42 -0500 To: Martin Langhoff In-Reply-To: <46a038f90511141420u11e396d3q9a6710c79abe0ca3@mail.gmail.com> (Martin Langhoff's message of "Tue, 15 Nov 2005 11:20:59 +1300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Martin Langhoff writes: > ... I'm happy with Kevin's patches -- what's the ideal > workflow for this? Is the sign-off line important enough that > I should setup a public repo for you to pull from? Given that you are far more familiar with that part of the code, and I suspect I'd be asking your help in archimport as well, a repo I can pull from would be more preferable (and sign-off by you is certainly an added bonus). If a public repo is too much hassle, however, e-mail forwarding is perfectly fine as well. Your choice. BTW, there is no "mana" points involved in deciding if I directly pull from somewhere. Even if that were the case, you have accumulated enough of them already ;-). > BTW, File::Basename is a standard library usually installed w perl -- > it shouldn't add any painful dependencies. Not sure if that matters. Although some might find "${\function}" expansion too cute for their taste, Keven's code is fine as-is for me. I launched the baloon just wanting to see what others have to say ;-).