From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Please undo "Use git-merge instead of git-resolve in Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 02:34:16 -0700 Message-ID: <7vslvwcelj.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20050922191058.GM21019@pasky.or.cz> <34462.10.10.10.28.1127417134.squirrel@linux1> <20050923091012.GA10255@pasky.or.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Sep 23 11:36:25 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EIjwk-0007A4-QU for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 11:34:23 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750847AbVIWJeT (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2005 05:34:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750848AbVIWJeT (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2005 05:34:19 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao08.cox.net ([68.230.241.31]:17083 "EHLO fed1rmmtao08.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750846AbVIWJeS (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2005 05:34:18 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao08.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20050923093417.FMVM28168.fed1rmmtao08.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 05:34:17 -0400 To: Petr Baudis In-Reply-To: <20050923091012.GA10255@pasky.or.cz> (Petr Baudis's message of "Fri, 23 Sep 2005 11:10:12 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Petr Baudis writes: > * cg-fetch can do with symlinked object database Do you mean ".git/object" in the repository you are fetching into is a symlink to somewhere, or something else? > * cg-fetch will hardlink if possible when fetching locally True, git-fetch and git-clone try to use pack protocols by default, which is debatable. Adding -l (similar to what git-clone does) would not be too hard, if enough people want it. > * cg-fetch won't do useless fetches when we are already > up-to-date Care to explain? Perhaps you are talking about rsync transport (in which case I would not be surprised)? > * I'm not sure if I could call git-fetch to do the initial > fetch during clone $ git-init-db && git fetch http://kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git should work. There is another minor "con", if you include git-clone in the discussion. Over http transport, it refuses to run against a remote repository that does not have info/refs and info/packs, even if it is not packed. I think cg-clone uses recursive wget for directory traversal and does not have to use them.