git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Martin Fick <mfick@codeaurora.org>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: How to still kill git fetch with too many refs
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 22:19:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vtxkd8rns.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130702050142.GA1206@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Tue, 2 Jul 2013 01:01:42 -0400")

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 12:41:51AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
>
>> I replicated your test setup, and the problem is that we have many
>> common objects on both sides during the ref negotiation. So we end up in
>> rev_list_push for each one, which has the same O(n^2) behavior.
>> Switching it to just sort at the end is not trivial; we first insert all
>> of the objects, but then we actually walk the parents, pushing onto the
>> list as we go. So I think we'd want a better data structure (like a
>> priority queue).
>
> Like the patch below, which is built on top of next (which has Junio's
> prio_queue implementation), and has both the priority queue fix for
> rev_list_push and the mark_complete sort-at-the-end fix.

Wow, I saw "160 lines" in my MUA which scared me a bit until I
opened it to realize 40% is discussion and most of the remaining
lines are context around single liners.

It just looks too easy/simple, but the result looks correct, at
least from a cursory read.

Good job ;-)

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-02  5:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-02  3:02 How to still kill git fetch with too many refs Martin Fick
2013-07-02  4:07 ` Jeff King
2013-07-02  4:41   ` Jeff King
2013-07-02  5:01     ` Jeff King
2013-07-02  5:19       ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2013-07-02  5:28         ` Jeff King
2013-07-02  6:11           ` [PATCH 0/3] avoid quadratic behavior in fetch-pack Jeff King
2013-07-02  6:16             ` [PATCH 1/3] fetch-pack: avoid quadratic list insertion in mark_complete Jeff King
2013-07-02  6:21             ` [PATCH 2/3] commit.c: make compare_commits_by_commit_date global Jeff King
2013-07-02  6:24             ` [PATCH 3/3] fetch-pack: avoid quadratic behavior in rev_list_push Jeff King
2013-07-02  7:52               ` Eric Sunshine
2013-07-02 17:45             ` [PATCH 0/3] avoid quadratic behavior in fetch-pack Martin Fick
2013-07-02 17:52       ` How to still kill git fetch with too many refs Brandon Casey
2013-07-02  9:24 ` Michael Haggerty
2013-07-02 16:58   ` Martin Fick

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7vtxkd8rns.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mfick@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).