From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: My use case Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:07:29 -0800 Message-ID: <7vtyu3o1hq.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1264840729-sup-5264@ezyang> <20100130174844.GD788@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Ron Garret X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jan 30 20:07:42 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NbIfW-0008Rq-8D for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 20:07:42 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754345Ab0A3THh (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:07:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754338Ab0A3THg (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:07:36 -0500 Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:58745 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754277Ab0A3THf (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:07:35 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5555F95CFC; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:07:35 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= sasl; bh=3efR3VkfDUAMwf24HSGfB0Zt1T8=; b=maEKJlG9EToBFtYWByuA9ye /AjbR80/VB3LQw9HKYhxgiPWn2gJQIi+Zhv62yzxV+dAPYgQplD/Km9ltJVp+ewb ol2DWsKh2Uj0M5ovaYpLVlDZLjcF7Al5N1NW3Q+ap2CG01xDKW2oE2UMt7Ogc6Lp 5lxW2QtvAxc+ZVvbH+Bw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q= dns; s=sasl; b=Oxl6+LdluHhAA57AsjupCeaMuFdaKWFG/s/xdSBnY+mwKOrif RwLn/EVcyD7qVFAJu9q2U5RrX0LX8P5d0Rnp9jicZHS+IdpdZySlEFuGZS7eVCyS 9RHK6o6VjgHOyejQMJXifMXvmyXI5Qn4Ced9PbFWn1QlMZyTn3wtHDUB5s= Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E0B95CFB; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:07:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 87F2695CF5; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:07:30 -0500 (EST) User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B855587E-0DD2-11DF-9765-6AF7ED7EF46B-77302942!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Ron Garret writes: > You are absolutely right. That is another reason why having the > individual files tracked separately from the main project would be a > good thing if I can get it to work. (It would be kind of like having a > git-stash on a per-file basis.) When you have more than one functions defined in a file, and the interactive Lisp development cycle works primarily on s-exp basis, not necessarily constrained by file boundaries, don't you want even finer grained control than "stash per-file"? I don't think of a good solution myself, but I find your "finer than whole tree" an interesting topic.