From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: receive.denyCurrentBranch Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 17:38:17 -0800 Message-ID: <7vtz74wfsm.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20090208042910.19079.qmail@science.horizon.com> <76718490902080950r798ca02es4e560da35e499046@mail.gmail.com> <76718490902081451xd953e84y33de64cc82c1da42@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jay Soffian , George Spelvin , gitster@pobox.com, git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Feb 09 02:40:19 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LWL8F-0000XQ-3p for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 02:40:19 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754502AbZBIBic (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Feb 2009 20:38:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754291AbZBIBic (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Feb 2009 20:38:32 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:34947 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753615AbZBIBib (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Feb 2009 20:38:31 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91F0A2ABAE; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 20:38:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 82BE22AB7F; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 20:38:21 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Mon, 9 Feb 2009 00:41:42 +0100 (CET)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 5A669674-F64A-11DD-81D8-6F7C8D1D4FD0-77302942!a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > On Sun, 8 Feb 2009, Jay Soffian wrote: > >> If you had paid attention, you would have noticed that Mercurial did not >> attempt to merge. Rather, it created a new branch head in the remote >> repository. > > So this is the "detached HEAD" idea. Which contradicts the law of the > least surprise. I do not think so. It is "adopting the symmetric mothership-satellite layout, when it suits the user's workflow".