From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATHv2 6/8] gitweb: retrieve snapshot format from PATH_INFO Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:09:14 -0700 Message-ID: <7vtzb5ydd1.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1224188831-17767-6-git-send-email-giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com> <1224426270-27755-1-git-send-email-giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com> <200810211844.35714.jnareb@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Jakub Narebski" , git@vger.kernel.org, "Petr Baudis" , "Junio C Hamano" To: "Giuseppe Bilotta" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Oct 21 21:10:52 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KsMcw-00021S-8p for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 21:10:46 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751126AbYJUTJd (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:09:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751045AbYJUTJd (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:09:33 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:65444 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750874AbYJUTJd (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:09:33 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CFD9725F5; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:09:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-211.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D105D725EC; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:09:22 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: CAB62D02-9FA3-11DD-B94A-9CEDC82D7133-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Giuseppe Bilotta" writes: >> But I'd rather have this patch series to be in separate thread... > > Yes, a posteriori I think it's better too. I'll resend the 5 path_info > patches with the minor stylistic corrections you suggested, and send > these 3 separately. I've only been watching from the sidelines, but the discussion seemed sensible. With the resend with Acks I think they are already 'next' material. Thanks, both of you.