From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Cc: Marius Storm-Olsen <marius@trolltech.com>,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>, git <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Respecting core.autocrlf when showing objects
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:33:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vtzfy8n4i.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4850E647.7050602@trolltech.com> (Marius Storm-Olsen's message of "Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:03:03 +0200")
Marius Storm-Olsen <marius@trolltech.com> writes:
> Johannes Schindelin said the following on 11.06.2008 21:06:
>> On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Marius Storm-Olsen wrote:
>>> Well, consider this:
>>>
>>> Say you are merging two branches, and know that you want to just
>>> use the parts which conflict from the branch being merged in. Then
>>> you simply do:
>>>
>>> git merge side
>>> git show :3:file.txt > file.txt
>>
>> This is not really how I would do things. I would do
>>
>> git checkout side file.txt here.
>
> Uhm, 'git checkout side file.txt' is not the same file content
> (ignoring EOLs please) as 'git show :3:file.txt'.
> Ref: user-manual.html#conflict-resolution
Bruce, I think the comment in this quoted section is wrong.
True, the combined diff can show only the interesting differences between
the three, but that is not because we munge stage #2 and #3. They contain
verbatim copies from the HEAD and the MERGE_HEAD respectively, and the
combining logic runs three-way diffs between the three stages to discard
the hunks that the result comes solely from either stage #2 or stage #3.
So perhaps something like this is in order...
---
Documentation/user-manual.txt | 15 +++++++--------
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/user-manual.txt b/Documentation/user-manual.txt
index bfde507..64a820b 100644
--- a/Documentation/user-manual.txt
+++ b/Documentation/user-manual.txt
@@ -1254,16 +1254,15 @@ these three "file stages" represents a different version of the file:
-------------------------------------------------
$ git show :1:file.txt # the file in a common ancestor of both branches
-$ git show :2:file.txt # the version from HEAD, but including any
- # nonconflicting changes from MERGE_HEAD
-$ git show :3:file.txt # the version from MERGE_HEAD, but including any
- # nonconflicting changes from HEAD.
+$ git show :2:file.txt # the version from HEAD.
+$ git show :3:file.txt # the version from MERGE_HEAD.
-------------------------------------------------
-Since the stage 2 and stage 3 versions have already been updated with
-nonconflicting changes, the only remaining differences between them are
-the important ones; thus linkgit:git-diff[1] can use the information in
-the index to show only those conflicts.
+When you ask linkgit:git-diff[1] to show the conflicts, it runs a
+three-way diff between the conflicted merge results in the work tree with
+stages 2 and 3 to show only hunks whose contents come from both sides,
+mixed (in other words, when a hunk's merge results come only from stage 2,
+that part is not conflicting and is not shown. Same for stage 3).
The diff above shows the differences between the working-tree version of
file.txt and the stage 2 and stage 3 versions. So instead of preceding
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-12 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <"Storm-Olsen*"@MHS>
2008-06-09 11:40 ` [PATCH] Add testcase for merging in a CRLF repo, showing that conflict file is in LF only Marius Storm-Olsen
2008-06-09 11:40 ` Marius Storm-Olsen
2008-06-09 13:37 ` Johannes Sixt
2008-06-09 14:46 ` Marius Storm-Olsen
2008-06-09 15:05 ` Johannes Sixt
2008-06-09 19:44 ` Marius Storm-Olsen
2008-06-09 21:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] Add testcase for merging in a CRLF repo Johannes Schindelin
2008-06-09 21:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] merge-recursive: respect core.autocrlf Johannes Schindelin
2008-06-09 21:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-09 22:59 ` [PATCH v2] " Johannes Schindelin
2008-06-09 23:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-09 23:35 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-06-10 8:10 ` [PATCH 0/2] Respecting core.autocrlf when showing objects Marius Storm-Olsen
2008-06-10 7:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] Add testcases for verifying that staged files in a conflict are CRLF, when core.autocrlf = true Marius Storm-Olsen
2008-06-10 7:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] Ensure that objects shown in a core.autocrlf = true repo have CRLF EOLs Marius Storm-Olsen
2008-06-10 15:34 ` [PATCH 0/2] Respecting core.autocrlf when showing objects Johannes Schindelin
2008-06-10 22:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-11 6:01 ` Marius Storm-Olsen
2008-06-11 8:25 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-06-11 19:06 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-06-12 9:03 ` Marius Storm-Olsen
2008-06-12 19:33 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2008-06-12 19:55 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-06-12 20:27 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-06-12 20:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-12 20:50 ` Jon Loeliger
2008-06-12 20:16 ` Marius Storm-Olsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vtzfy8n4i.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=bfields@citi.umich.edu \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
--cc=marius@trolltech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).