From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.5-rc2 Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:05:09 -0700 Message-ID: <7vtziq1rwa.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7viqz72we4.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080328181345.GB8299@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Mar 28 22:06:56 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JfLm0-0005cm-U2 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 22:06:05 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754926AbYC1VFW (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:05:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754738AbYC1VFW (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:05:22 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:59333 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754478AbYC1VFV (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:05:21 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 591421312; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:05:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC454130C; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:05:16 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20080328181345.GB8299@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:13:45 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:30:27PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> GIT 1.5.5-rc2 was tagged tonight, and it is available from the usual >> places. > > I never got a response to my patches to fix encoding issues in > "send-email --compose". It _is_ a bugfix, but I don't know if it is > 1.5.5-worthy. Forgotten (and I should resubmit now), or should I wait > until after the release? I was getting the impression that it was still in "ah, but this is better", "you are right, but how about doing this", stage and was hoping that "ok, based on the discussion here is the final one" will come soon.