From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] diff --relative: output paths as relative to the current subdirectory Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:59:16 -0800 Message-ID: <7vtzkdzn6j.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vzlu524n9.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vfxvx211k.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Torvalds X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Feb 13 02:00:22 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JP5z3-0000xS-3Z for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 02:00:21 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751866AbYBMA7r (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:59:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751577AbYBMA7r (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:59:47 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:52570 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751334AbYBMA7q (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:59:46 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D21D2C51; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:59:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45E1D2C4E; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:59:34 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Linus Torvalds's message of "Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:53:06 -0800 (PST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Linus Torvalds writes: > On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >> Your example is shorter to type as: >> >> (cd drivers/scsi && git diff --relative a..b --) > > No it isn't. The above doesn't even work for bare > repositories,... AHHHHH. You are right.