From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: git-browse-help? Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 09:38:05 -0800 Message-ID: <7vtzmlrxc2.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20071214092829.GA22725@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christian Couder , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Dec 14 18:38:52 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J3EUt-0000Ay-4q for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:38:51 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753888AbXLNRi2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2007 12:38:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753346AbXLNRi2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2007 12:38:28 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:41606 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753276AbXLNRi1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2007 12:38:27 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB7ED9391; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 12:38:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F855938B; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 12:38:10 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20071214092829.GA22725@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Fri, 14 Dec 2007 04:28:30 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > The new 'git-browse-help' seems to purely be a helper script for "git > help" (judging from the commit messages and the lack of documentation). > Should it perhaps be "git--browse-help" or "git-help--browse" to follow > our "this is not for users" convention (see add--interactive, > fetch--tool, and rebase--interactive). > > I became aware of it because "br" used to tab-complete "branch" but now > doesn't. :) And if we're going to change it, pre-1.5.4 is the time. Good eyes and a sensible argument. Go wild.