From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] fetch-pack: Prepare for a side-band demultiplexer in a thread. Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:42:11 -0800 Message-ID: <7vtznkz8nw.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <200711172309.28364.johannes.sixt@telecom.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Sixt X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Nov 18 01:42:36 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ItYF7-0003oc-VX for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 01:42:34 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753054AbXKRAmR (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Nov 2007 19:42:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753298AbXKRAmQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Nov 2007 19:42:16 -0500 Received: from sceptre.pobox.com ([207.106.133.20]:52265 "EHLO sceptre.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752278AbXKRAmQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Nov 2007 19:42:16 -0500 Received: from sceptre (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by sceptre.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ADB32EF; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 19:42:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sceptre.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22FC996C2C; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 19:42:35 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <200711172309.28364.johannes.sixt@telecom.at> (Johannes Sixt's message of "Sat, 17 Nov 2007 23:09:28 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Sixt writes: > This change again originates from the MinGW port. Since we don't > have fork(2) on Windows, we must run the sideband demultiplexer > in a thread. If the rationale was "running in a thread is more natural on the platform", I would understand it. But "_must_ run because there is no fork(2)" solicits a "Huh? How does Cygwin does it then?" from me.