From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Newbie: report of first experience with git-rebase. Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 12:11:19 -0700 Message-ID: <7vtzo431k8.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <87d4uv3wh1.fsf@osv.gnss.ru> <20071031195702.GB24332@atjola.homenet> <874pg73u6h.fsf@osv.gnss.ru> <7vhck7gdzs.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <87ve8m2mfn.fsf@osv.gnss.ru> <20071101151016.GA26103@fieldses.org> <7v8x5hbtvv.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <472AF840.1070609@op5.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" , Johannes Schindelin , Sergei Organov , git@vger.kernel.org To: Andreas Ericsson X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Nov 02 20:11:52 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Io1vm-0006fZ-Bi for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2007 20:11:46 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756039AbXKBTL3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Nov 2007 15:11:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753886AbXKBTL3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Nov 2007 15:11:29 -0400 Received: from sceptre.pobox.com ([207.106.133.20]:47991 "EHLO sceptre.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755450AbXKBTL2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Nov 2007 15:11:28 -0400 Received: from sceptre (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by sceptre.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E595B2F2; Fri, 2 Nov 2007 15:11:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sceptre.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB2F9093F; Fri, 2 Nov 2007 15:11:43 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Andreas Ericsson writes: > Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >> Now, we have established that this is a real problem worth >> solving, what's next? > > Make "git rebase --skip" skip patches regardless of tree and index state, > but still refuse to *start* with dirty tree or index. That way, there's > no risk of losing anything that can't be re-created unless the user asks > for it. Sounds like a plan.