From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add git-rev-list --invert-match Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:49:14 -0700 Message-ID: <7vtzppj9d1.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20070919202615.GK3076@jukie.net> <20070920123849.GD12076@jukie.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Bart Trojanowski , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Sep 20 23:49:27 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IYTtl-0005Wp-2M for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 23:49:25 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752036AbXITVtU (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:49:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751748AbXITVtU (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:49:20 -0400 Received: from rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.210.124.37]:49874 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751649AbXITVtT (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:49:19 -0400 Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83C1138D5F; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:49:37 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:12:54 +0100 (BST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > Further, it probably makes sense to have the option to say _both_: "Find > me a commit that contains Bart in one line, but not Simpson, and that > does not contain the word "Sverdoolaege" at all." Yeah. And I think we would also want to have that at the underlying "grep" layer wouldn't we?