From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: metastore Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 23:06:46 -0700 Message-ID: <7vtzpt3jwp.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20070915132632.GA31610@piper.oerlikon.madduck.net> <20070915145437.GA12875@piper.oerlikon.madduck.net> <7vwsur590q.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7v7imq5ki0.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vk5qq3y76.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7v7imp539u.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Daniel Barkalow , martin f krafft , git@vger.kernel.org, "Thomas Harning Jr." , Francis Moreau , Nicolas Vilz , David =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=A4rdeman?= To: david@lang.hm X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Sep 17 08:07:11 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IX9lC-0003Cg-De for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 08:07:06 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752110AbXIQGG7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2007 02:06:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751854AbXIQGG7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2007 02:06:59 -0400 Received: from rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.210.124.37]:53636 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752060AbXIQGG7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2007 02:06:59 -0400 Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96E2C13537B; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 02:07:10 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (david@lang.hm's message of "Sun, 16 Sep 2007 21:35:21 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: david@lang.hm writes: > On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> I also need to rant here a bit. >> >> Fortunately we haven't had this problem too many times on this >> list, but sometimes people say "Here is my patch. If this is >> accepted I'll add documentation and tests". I rarely reply to >> such patches without sugarcoating my response, but my internal >> reaction is, "Don't you, as the person who proposes that change, >> believe in your patch deeply enough to be willing to perfect it, >> in order to make it suitable for consumption by the general >> public, whether it is included in my tree or not? A change that >> even you do not believe in yourself has very little chance of >> benefitting the general public, so thanks but no thanks, I'll >> pass." > > I hope that my questions did not seem to fall into this catagory. Not at all.