From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] t9400: Add test cases for config file handling Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 09:38:49 -0700 Message-ID: <7vtzu6dtd2.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <11797003182642-git-send-email-frank@lichtenheld.de> <7vlkfjhu2w.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20070521163145.GM4085@planck.djpig.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Git Mailing List , Martin Langhoff To: Frank Lichtenheld X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon May 21 18:39:01 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HqAuS-0005rw-Io for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 18:39:00 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755978AbXEUQiw (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2007 12:38:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755821AbXEUQiv (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2007 12:38:51 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao105.cox.net ([68.230.241.41]:36756 "EHLO fed1rmmtao105.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755978AbXEUQiv (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2007 12:38:51 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao105.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070521163851.MNO22040.fed1rmmtao105.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Mon, 21 May 2007 12:38:51 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id 1sep1X00i1kojtg0000000; Mon, 21 May 2007 12:38:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070521163145.GM4085@planck.djpig.de> (Frank Lichtenheld's message of "Mon, 21 May 2007 18:31:45 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Frank Lichtenheld writes: > On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 05:57:27PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> This part seems to fail for me and gets an "unexpected cvs success". > > Note the note in the patch ;) > >> diff --git a/git-cvsserver.perl b/git-cvsserver.perl >> index fcfb99d..1de5177 100755 >> --- a/git-cvsserver.perl >> +++ b/git-cvsserver.perl >> @@ -192,11 +192,9 @@ sub req_Root >> } >> } >> >> - unless ( ($cfg->{gitcvs}{$state->{method}}{enabled} >> - and $cfg->{gitcvs}{$state->{method}}{enabled} =~ /^\s*(1|true|yes)\s*$/i) >> - or ($cfg->{gitcvs}{enabled} >> - and $cfg->{gitcvs}{enabled} =~ /^\s*(1|true|yes)\s*$/i) ) >> - { >> + my $enabled = ($cfg->{gitcvs}{$state->{method}}{enabled} >> + || $cfg->{gitcvs}{enabled}); >> + unless ($enabled && $enabled =~ /^\s*(1|true|yes)\s*$/i) { >> print "E GITCVS emulation needs to be enabled on this repo\n"; >> print "E the repo config file needs a [gitcvs] section added, and the parameter 'enabled' set to 1\n"; >> print "E \n"; > > Yeah, should probably have fixed that myself before sending, but the > other patches were already prepared ;) Ok, so that's an Ack?