From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] autoconf: Preliminary check for working mmap Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 22:10:45 -0700 Message-ID: <7vu03mkiei.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <200609050054.24279.jnareb@gmail.com> <200609050056.52590.jnareb@gmail.com> <7vy7szjjal.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060905030929.GA29865@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Sep 05 07:10:50 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GKTCq-0004WW-Lt for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 05 Sep 2006 07:10:41 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965157AbWIEFKV (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Sep 2006 01:10:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965154AbWIEFKV (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Sep 2006 01:10:21 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao07.cox.net ([68.230.241.32]:31110 "EHLO fed1rmmtao07.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965158AbWIEFKT (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Sep 2006 01:10:19 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao07.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060905051019.MVMR21457.fed1rmmtao07.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Tue, 5 Sep 2006 01:10:19 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id JVAK1V00U1kojtg0000000 Tue, 05 Sep 2006 01:10:20 -0400 To: Shawn Pearce In-Reply-To: <20060905030929.GA29865@spearce.org> (Shawn Pearce's message of "Mon, 4 Sep 2006 23:09:29 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Shawn Pearce writes: > I'm maybe only 1/3 of the way through the sliding window mmap > implementation. I've got a good chunk of sha1_file.c converted but I > still have to deal with the copying in pack-objects.c and the verify > code in verify-pack.c. I'm hoping I can send a preliminary patch > series tomorrow as I'm going to work on it more tonight and tomorrow. Thanks -- I was tempted to do this myself after finishing the index_64 change in "pu" branch, but have resisted the temptation myself so far. Being lazy, the less I have to code the better, naturally ;-).