From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Subject: Re: Managing topic branches
Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 02:14:37 -0800
Message-ID: <7vu0adgpv6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
References: <7vzmk5lkmo.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
	<46a038f90603050135j41eaf935kd48ab68212218836@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Mar 05 11:14:45 2006
Return-path: <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FFqG9-00074K-HB
	for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 05 Mar 2006 11:14:41 +0100
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752247AbWCEKOj (ORCPT <rfc822;gcvg-git@m.gmane.org>);
	Sun, 5 Mar 2006 05:14:39 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752246AbWCEKOj
	(ORCPT <rfc822;git-outgoing>); Sun, 5 Mar 2006 05:14:39 -0500
Received: from fed1rmmtao11.cox.net ([68.230.241.28]:37081 "EHLO
	fed1rmmtao11.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752237AbWCEKOi (ORCPT <rfc822;git@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 5 Mar 2006 05:14:38 -0500
Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127])
          by fed1rmmtao11.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP
          id <20060305101255.UEWG6244.fed1rmmtao11.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>;
          Sun, 5 Mar 2006 05:12:55 -0500
To: "Martin Langhoff" <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <46a038f90603050135j41eaf935kd48ab68212218836@mail.gmail.com>
	(Martin Langhoff's message of "Sun, 5 Mar 2006 22:35:33 +1300")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/17218>

"Martin Langhoff" <martin.langhoff@gmail.com> writes:

> In any case, this was perhaps based on a misunderstanding/error on my
> side. To start off, I didn't understand how you were managing next.

No nononononono nooooo.

If I sounded like you were the guilty party I apologize.  I did
not mean it that way.

It was my mistake.  I encouraged people to experiment and build
upon "next".  It was just the way I pulled the stuff in was bad.